icon_arrow_down icon_arrow_left icon_arrow_left_large icon_arrow_right icon_arrow_right_large icon_arrow_up icon_bullet_arrow icon_call icon_close icon_facebook icon_googleplus icon_grid_off icon_instagram icon_login icon_mail icon_menu icon_message icon_minus icon_pinterest icon_plus icon_quote_end icon_quote_start icon_refresh icon_search icon_tick_on icon_twitter icon_video_play icon_youtube

Sign up to our mailing list for the latest Boat International & Events news.

SIGN UP

Missing your newsletter?

If you’ve unsubscribed by mistake and would like to continue to hear about the latest Boat International & Events news, update your preferences now and let us know which emails you’d like to receive.

UPDATE NOW
No, thanks
Keel design for shallow water

Keel design for shallow water

The resulting FC Cube 100’ would seem an obvious candidate for a canting keel, but as Finot Conq’s David de Premorel explains, they decided against it. ‘We did look at having a keel that was both lifting and canting, but it would have been a big weight penalty.

‘Since the intention for the boat is to do some of the big offshore races, you need a minimum AVS – an angle of vanishing stability – of about 105 degrees for a boat of that size. It’s something that is indirectly specified in the sailing instructions of these races, and also a basic safety feature for the boat. The problem with a canting keel is that, once you’re canted, your capsizing angle decreases.

‘If you want a canting keel and the same minimum capsizing angle, you need either a deeper draught or more bulb weight to compensate.’

In the end the canting keel option was rejected on safety grounds, but also with the problems of maintenance making it less attractive too. Instead, the FC Cube 100’ is being built with a lifting keel giving a 5.4m maximum draught.

‘We would have loved to have an even deeper maximum draught,’ says de Premorel, ‘but the lifting movement of the keel is limited by the height of the hull and deck. If you limit yourself to a certain figure when the keel is up, it mechanically limits you to a certain draught when the keel is down.’

The only other option would be to install the lifting ram above deck, and apart from the technical challenges, for most superyacht owners this would be too much of an aesthetic sacrifice.

So what other options are out there? If you can’t achieve sufficient righting moment with one keel, what about having two? After all, we’re used to the idea of two masts. Briand doesn’t dismiss it as such a silly idea.

‘Twin keels have been done in the America’s Cup for some time, and it’s a configuration we studied when we’ve been involved in design projects for the Cup. So we know a bit about this, and yes, this could be a solution for bigger boats.

‘Maybe one time we will do it; the only problem we have with that is the ability for tacking and manoeuvring, as having one keel forward and one aft has a big effect.’

However, as Briand acknowledges, if the ‘tandem’ keel was worth considering for America’s Cup racing, and all the tight manoeuvring that this kind of racing entails, it should be good enough for the more sedate world of blue-water cruising.

‘I wouldn’t be surprised to see this in the future,’ he says. ‘We certainly wouldn’t rule out the possibility.’

While the tandem keel remains just a concept at superyacht level, one alternative configuration that is already making its way in the superyacht world is what Briand refers to as a ‘centreboarder’, otherwise known as a ‘whale body’.

Upgrade your account
Your account at BOAT International doesn't include a BOAT Pro subscription. Please subscribe to BOAT Pro in order to unlock this content.
Subscribe More about BOAT Pro